A well researched and thorough history on the status of Tibet since 1947 The book is written in a rather academic style so if one is unfamiliar with any history on Tibet it might be easier to start with another book It is an excellent addition to the diplomatic and political history surrounding Tibet A lengthy but a comprehensive book on contemporary Tibet from the invasion till present A serious history of the relationship between Tibet and China from the late 1940s to the 1990s While Shakya to me is obvious about his own political leanings he still presents a nuanced and complicated portrait of the relationship
Between The Communist Party And The the COMMUNIST PARTY AND THE POPULATION Communist Party and the population dutifully describes the history of the Cultural Revolution in Tibet as well as the attempts to superimpose Han Chinese culture over the Tibetan but he also recognizes how many poorer Tibetans latched on to the CCP during such campaigns as land reform Shakya also describes to a considerable extent US involvement in Tibet including the efforts of intelligence agencies I would have liked about the changes in Tibetan society itself but I realize this is a limitation based on the available sources That said I feel informed after I read this book than before and that s what I can ask for It is a big book but enjoyable Slow read as a lot of history details The author made a big research on the contemporary history of Tibet and it shows that he feels for his country If you read one book on history of Tibet make it this one This is a really intensive tell all book that covers modern Tibetan history which is usually lossed over in every work on Tibet with the same epithet China invaded Tibet in 1950 the Dalai Lama escaped Tibet for India in 1959 and the Tibetan homeland has been under foreign horrifying rule ever since A review from Jonathan Mirsky puts it correctly saying It will irritate both Chinese and Tibetan chauvinists as it explodes their myths misunderstandings and propaganda I could not put it better myself Written by a Tibetan living in exile and teaching at some of the premier British and Canadian universities Tsering Shakya paints an extremely well researched and descriptive history of Tibet s case for independence as well as the Chinese developments of the country post invasion He never outright refutes China s position but does an excellent job showing how their case for Tibet as an integral part of the motherland is constructed bullshit and for evidence of Tibet s position as an independent non Chinese culture you could look well anywhere and ultimately falls short of the Communist Party s Creating Country Music: Fabricating Authenticity goal of communist paradise on the Plateau Again not for the lay follower as it. Based entirely on unpublished primary sources Tsering Shakya'sroundbreaking history of modern Tibet shatters the popular conception of the country as an isolated Shangri la unaffected by broader international developments Shakya ives a balanced blow by blow account of Tibet's ongoing struggle to mai. ,
Tsering Shakya Ð 4 SummaryHal It has not profited from changes in Indian leadership or changes in Western approaches Although the United States funded some rebels in the fifties enerally Tibet came in third or worse in the US policy concerns etting intermittent attention while Korea or Vietnam or rapprochement with the PRC was the main focus Lost in all this is the impression that the Tibetans entered this drama as a feudalistic and theocratic state and as Shakya points out from time to time the concerns of Lhasa are not always those of the people who worked on the monasteries and other landholders estates And some of that ineuality seems to have ameliorated But it cannot be denied that whatever improvements have occurred came at the cost of Tibetan independence and self determination and was marred by erratic policies based on the myths of Han Chinese nationalism and doctrinaire interpretations of Marxist theory There are a few who demonstrate real courage in this complex tragedy the occasional Chinese administrator who tried to mitigate the oppression the late Panchen Rinpoche who at first embraced the Chinese but then subjected them to withering criticism and the Dalai Lama who although his politics were not without mistakes was thrust into
This Position As An Adolescentposition as an adolescent has rown into the international spokesman for an otherwise voiceless people It would have been interesting to seem his struggle against the feudalists of an independent Tibet Or perhaps he would not have become the figure that he has become A left leaning Tibetan throughly debunks the propaganda of both PRC colonialism and the feudal conservatives in exileIf you read one book on modern Tibetan historymake it this one An impeccably detailed history of Tibetan Chinese relations from 1947 to 1990 Though it can read a little drily it is an impressive piece of scholarship shedding light on the secretive political machinations at play between the two countries Tsering s analysis is lucid and compelling Essential reading Wonderful book Detailed and passionate account of events of Tibet Writing is lucid and elaborate A thoroughly researched dissertation like book on the history of Sino Tibetan relations In the highly charged and politicized topic that is Tibet the author retains credibility as a relatively objective historian when
the political machinations personal humanitarian atrocities all while refraining from being polemic Like all history Tibet s is driven by individual personalities and one is able to et a sense of how people including politicians on the Tibetan side affected the course of Sino Tibetan history Anyone wishing to understand the Tibet issue should read this book. Ided strategies Rising above the simplistic dualism so often found in accounts of Tibet's contested recent history The Dragon in the Land of Snows lucidly depicts the tragedy that has befallen Tibet and identifies the conflicting forces that continue to shape the aspirations of the Tibetan people today. Can be dry at times "And Is Very In Depth " is very in depth said for those who need a balanced look at Tibetan history or of HH the Dalai Lama XIV who is often portrayed as a wonderful angel and benevolent od king who does no wrong this is an exceptional work This is an impressively researched and no less impressively objective account of the Chinese seizure of most of Tibet in 1949 and its management of what the People s Republic admits is a minority population since The major defect is that at least the version I read stops in the ninetiesA number of points stand out The Tibetans most ofDescribing The Political Machinations Personal
Whom Had Enjoyed Autonomy After The Disintegration Of The Inghad enjoyed autonomy after the disintegration of the ing were completely unprepared to face the modernizing army of the united People s Republic The In times of crisis the Tibetans were prone to consult oracles as oracles tend to do made enigmatic pronouncements Tsering Shakya documents one instance in which the oracle bristled when pressed for clarity The Tibetan Army s operation were painfully out of date since they travelled with families as Shakya notes they were completely unprepared for a defensive retreat and the Chinese cut off their rear with ease The Chinese claim to Tibet is based on it being part of historical Creating Chicago's North Shore: A Suburban History greater China The odd thing about that is that aside from the long periods of Tibetan self rule the major periods of Chinese sovereignty over Tibet came during dynasties that were not themselves Han Chinese the Yuan and the ing the latter of which exercised little formal administrative control Oddly enough when faced with finding the reincarnation of the Panchen Rimpoche the PRC resorted to a ing procedure I had always thought that part of the PRC s need for Tibet was toive a purpose to excess Han sons as the British operated their empire for economics and pride but also to ive younger Britons something to do But at least in Shakya s account the claim is based on the dubious historicity of dynastic China which is an odd thing for a Marxist regime to do the motive being pride in the feudalistic past rather than achieving the classless paradise They have company in this pride business since the Russians won t ive up parts of Central Asia nor the Turks Syrians or Irais allow Kurds their independence
To address my own country s acuisitive habits would overwhelm this space The Tibetans haveaddress my own country s acuisitive habits would overwhelm this space The Tibetans have the misfortune of not just the PRC s dramatic shifts in philosophy toward what they call minorities Chicana Falsa going slow then fast then setting loose the Red Guards then opening the economy then cracking down on protest in this Mao when alive comes across as a kind of oracle himself detached and presenting himself to make enigmatic pronouncements but of course often let. Ntain its independence and safeguard its cultural identity while being sandwiched between the heavyweights of Asianeopolitics Britain India China and the United States With thorough documentation Shakya details the Chinese depredations of Tibet and reveals the failures of the Tibetan leadership's div.